Understanding the Kill Zone Theory
The “kill zone” theory lets courts say that if someone tries to kill a specific target, they can be convicted of attempted murder of others nearby—if there’s proof they intended to kill everyone in that area. This theory has been widely used in gang-related cases and incidents involving crowds.
The Canizales Decision: Limiting the Kill Zone Theory
In People v. Canizales, the California Supreme Court ruled that the kill zone theory should only apply if there is strong proof that a person wanted to kill everyone near their main target. This new standard means that prosecutors and courts must be careful about using the kill zone theory, which may open doors for post-conviction challenges.
Who Can Use This Ruling for Post-Conviction Relief?
- Drive-By Shooting Convictions: If you were convicted of attempted murder in a drive-by shooting but did not aim to kill everyone nearby, this ruling could help you challenge your conviction.
- Gang-Related Attempted Murder Convictions: If you were convicted based on targeting a rival but without clear evidence of intent to kill bystanders, Canizales might support a new argument for post-conviction relief.
- Cases Involving Crowds or Bystanders: If you were only trying to harm one person in a crowd, Canizales requires stronger evidence for additional attempted murder charges. This might help reduce or reverse convictions related to bystanders.
- Convictions with Few Shots Fired: If there was no clear intent to kill everyone around your target, and only minimal shots were fired, this ruling could strengthen a challenge against your attempted murder convictions.
What to Do Next
If you believe your conviction relied on the kill zone theory without strong proof of intent to harm everyone around your main target, this decision may provide a way to seek relief.
***
Disclaimer: This blog is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For specific legal guidance on your case, please contact The Mines Law Firm for representation.
