In California, a civil trial’s outcome, especially one where a defendant was not found liable for wrongful death, can affect past criminal proceedings, even if the defendant took a plea deal. Here’s how new evidence from a subsequent civil trial might influence an earlier criminal case.
Understanding the Differences Between Civil and Criminal Cases
- Different Standards of Proof: Civil and criminal cases have different standards of proof. Civil cases require proof “by a preponderance of the evidence,” meaning more likely than not, while criminal cases require proof “beyond a reasonable doubt.” Because of this difference, a civil finding of no liability does not necessarily impact a criminal conviction directly but can be significant in the context of new evidence.
- New Evidence from Civil Trials: When a civil trial reveals new evidence that was not available during the criminal case, it could potentially affect the earlier criminal proceedings, especially if the defendant took a plea deal.
How Civil Trial Outcomes Affect Criminal Cases with Plea Deals
- Plea Deal Review: A plea deal is a legal agreement where a defendant pleads guilty to a lesser charge or receives a lighter sentence in exchange for waiving their right to a trial. If new evidence from a civil trial suggests that the defendant was not involved in the wrongful death or crime, it might prompt a review of the plea deal. This new evidence might indicate that the plea was based on incomplete or incorrect information.
- Motion for Post-Conviction Relief: In California, a defendant who has taken a plea deal and later finds new evidence through a civil trial can file a motion for post-conviction relief. This motion argues that the new evidence warrants revisiting the plea deal or the original conviction. The court will review whether the new evidence undermines the basis of the plea deal.
- Petition for a New Trial: Although less common in the context of a plea deal, if the new evidence from the civil trial is compelling and suggests that the defendant was wrongfully convicted, the defense can petition for a new trial. This is more challenging in cases where a plea deal has been accepted, but significant new evidence can sometimes justify revisiting the case.
- Appeal: In cases where the defendant has taken a plea deal, appealing the conviction is generally more difficult, as appeals typically focus on errors during the trial. However, new evidence from a civil trial could potentially be used to argue that the plea deal was not entered into knowingly or that the evidence was significantly misleading.
Process for Introducing New Evidence
- Gather Evidence: Collect all relevant new evidence from the civil trial. This includes documents, testimonies, and findings that were not previously available.
- File a Motion: Submit a motion for post-conviction relief or reconsideration to the court, presenting the new evidence and explaining its relevance to the plea deal.
- Consult with an Attorney: Work with a criminal defense attorney to assess the impact of the new evidence and to guide you through the legal process of challenging the plea deal or seeking relief.
Consulting with an Attorney
If new evidence from a civil trial suggests that a plea deal in a criminal case was based on inaccurate or incomplete information, consulting with a criminal defense attorney is essential. They can help evaluate the new evidence and determine the best legal steps to take.
***
Disclaimer: This blog provides general information and is not legal advice. For assistance with a criminal case or to understand how new evidence might impact your situation, please contact a qualified attorney for representation.